May 23, 2015 Leave a comment
“I have no issues with them believing in what they believe in. I think everyone’s entitled to their own opinion. But I don’t think they should put their personal beliefs inside their business.”
HONORING THOSE WHO KEEP THE DUMBASS FLAG FLYING
May 19, 2015 Leave a comment
Let’s get this shit straight. 1. WMDs (i.e., high-concentration sarin) were reported by NYT in February. Use your Google Machine.
2. Item #1 does not rely on your opinions in order to be a fact–unless you want to argue with NYT about the WMDs they conceded existed.
3. Related to #2: I did not support the invasion, because of geopolitical/realpolitik considerations; i.e., Iran.
4. Once troops were in harm’s way, the only goal was to win, and secure the victory.
5. The Democrats and their titular head Mr. Obama did what they always do: They fucked our allies and turned victory into surrender.
6. Iraq is a shit hole now because of Democrats, notwithstanding imaginative alternative non-invasion scenarios poli-sci-fi theorists hatch.
7. Drooling half-wits like Mr. TPM might want to drop their junior high snark long enough to form a coherent thought. But first, fuck off.
8. And the next idiot candidate who says “knowing what we know now” while omitting high-concentration sarin is being breathtakingly stupid.
9. So instead of playing the Knowing What We Know Now game about the invasion, LET’S PLAY IT ON THE TOPIC OF THE PRECIPITOUS WITHDRAWAL.
10. I don’t expect us to walk and chew gum on this. We’ve invested so much in our lovely uniforms–it’s all about whatever team we root for.
11. Suddenly the Left has forgotten their obsession with preventing nuclear proliferation. They’d rather mock W for saying “nuclear” wrong.
12. Hubris trigger warning: Just about everybody is getting this shit ass-backwards. There were WMDs. So what? Iran was always the problem.
May 17, 2015 Leave a comment
This will pay dividends later in life:
Mouthing off in class or failing to follow a teacher’s instructions will no longer lead to suspension in Oakland schools, a ban that will be phased in and be fully in effect just over a year from now, the school board unanimously decided Wednesday night.
Oakland Unified will become one of a handful of California school districts that restrict suspensions to more serious offenses and eliminate the punishment for willful defiance — a broad category of misbehavior that includes minor offenses such as refusing to take a hat off or ignoring teacher requests to stop texting and more severe incidents like swearing at a teacher or storming out of class.
Meanwhile, in Baltimore:
The Baltimore Peoples Power Assembly hosted what it called a “massive protest” Saturday afternoon calling for the dropping of all charges against those arrested in recent weeks in connection with the riots and looting associated with the death of 25-year-old Freddie Gray in police custody.
And over in Milwaukee, some Leftist love for a cop-killer:
It turns out that Shakur keeps on teaching, having found a prominent position at Marquette University in Milwaukee, Wis. That position is on a wall in the university’s Gender and Sexuality Resource Center, in the form of a mural featuring her likeness and two quotes.
The Left turns everything it touches into shit.
May 14, 2015 Leave a comment
“The bold adventurer succeeds the best.” —Ovid
“What fresh hell can this be?” —Dorothy Parker
Well, Dorothy, you’d probably be sorry you asked, if you were still around to read the latest from Columbia University, as reported in The Washington Post:
In an op-ed in the student newspaper, four Columbia University undergrads have called on the school to implement trigger warnings — alerts about potentially distressing material — even for classics like Greek mythology or Roman poetry.
“Ovid’s ‘Metamorphoses’ is a fixture of Lit Hum, but like so many texts in the Western canon, it contains triggering and offensive material that marginalizes student identities in the classroom,” wrote the four students, who are members of Columbia’s Multicultural Affairs Advisory Board. “These texts, wrought with histories and narratives of exclusion and oppression, can be difficult to read and discuss as a survivor, a person of color, or a student from a low-income background.”
Where to begin?
They are saying that race and class are themselves implicitly traumatic and need to be approached as one would a true mental illness. They’re saying that being non-white or poor is a kind of disability that requires special accommodations. Am I the only person who sees that as grossly offensive?
Here’s the deeper problem: triggering is a real thing in mental illness and trauma. A trigger can lead to serious psychological and physiological effects, trawling up memories that haven’t been properly dealt with and leading to anxiety attacks. Anyway who understands anxiety knows this to be true.
However, a victim of violence who is triggered so easily and frequently is suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and needs serious counseling and medication. If they try to assiduously avoid any and all potential triggers, then they are not engaged in healing. They are engaged in avoidance. Indeed, avoiding “triggers” is a way of avoiding coming to grips with the problem, which has the effect of worsening the PTSD.
The answer is not to reshape the public square to accommodate them, because literally anything (a color, a smell) can be a trigger. Trigger warnings exist only to claim public victim status and reshape the debate.
And then it’s a short walk to demanding that trigger warnings be slapped onto ideas with which one merely disagrees, such as the sort of icky thoughts espoused by the estimable Christina Hoff Sommers:
“Tonight, Republicans are hosting an extremist anti-feminist speaker that dismisses and denies survivors of sexual assault and the real harm of rape culture. Current College Republicans leadership has not been willing to do simple things like add a trigger/ content warning, or clarify why they felt it was appropriate to bring this speaker into our community.”
Old-line Leftists must be wondering what has become of their glorious revolution–at least that’s one upside to all this, aside from the entertainment value. The new-breed vanguard of the proletariat seem to have gone all wobbly (pun intended).
See also: “Warning: The Literary Canon Could Make Students Squirm” (The New York Times, 5/17/14)
(And yes, I know–the referenced quote in the title of this blog post is not precisely correct.)
May 8, 2015 Leave a comment
It’s a long story.
May 2, 2015 Leave a comment
Artificial intelligence and robots are not just challenging blue-collar jobs; they are starting to take over white-collar professions as well. Financial and sports reporters, online marketers, surgeons, anesthesiologists, and financial analysts are already in danger of being replaced by robots….
While it is hard to fully anticipate the consequences of this major societal shift towards intelligent machines, we can find comfort in the fact that we still have a leg up on robots for certain jobs: ones that require judgment, creative thinking, and human interaction.
Given Hillary Clinton’s robotic demeanor, reflexive Leftism, and the apparent lack of creativity and human interaction in her campaign, that can only mean one thing:
An historic First Robot President.
April 20, 2015 Leave a comment
A brief excerpt just to pique your interest:
We are often asked how we can just give our kids away to strangers. We are seen as uncaring, as though choosing to give them up so they can have the life we could never provide, is something to be ashamed of. We are the “taboo” part of the warm fuzzy adoption stories. We are often seen as broken, unfit, or unworthy.
Often, you will hear adoptive parents speak of the birthmom as an addict, or “just didn’t have her life together”. You’ll hear them say how appreciative they are, but view themselves as almost better, because they are able to offer the child something the birthmom couldn’t. I know in my heart they don’t truly mean it like that, at least I hope not. But when I hear the stories from adoptive parents, I can’t help but feel a little sting in empathy for their birthmom when they speak about how she was unable, unfit.
Please read the whole thing here, and share it with friends: http://mellific.wordpress.com/
April 17, 2015 Leave a comment
Jesus H. Tap-Dancing Christ, people. Stop accepting this nonsense as if it’s true. It’s a lie. Are we that fucking intellectually-lazy?
It’s a lie because the “CEOs” (which, contrasted with “the average worker,” is meant to imply the average CEO) being discussed are a mere handful of the highest paid CEOs leading publicly-traded companies.
While the huge multi-million pay packages of a few hundred CEOs get all of the media attention, what usually receives much less attention is the small number of CEOs represented in the annual salary surveys, especially compared to the total number of CEOs in the US. For example, the WSJ’s survey included only 300 CEOs at large, U.S.-traded public companies, and the AP analyzed compensation figures for only 337 companies in the S&P 500. An analysis of CEO pay by USA Today in April looked at only 200 CEOs in the S&P500. The AFL-CIO did an analysis of the CEOs of 350 companies in the S&P500 and then computed a “CEO-to-worker pay ratio” of 331 times ($11,700,000 average annual CEO pay to the $35,239 average annual worker pay), up from a ratio of 300 ten years ago and 200 twenty years ago.
Although these samples of 200-350 CEOs are representative of large, publicly-traded US companies, they certainly aren’t very representative of the average US company or the average US CEO. According to the US Census Bureau, there are more than 27 million private firms in the US, so the samples of 200-350 firms for CEO pay represent only one of about every 100,000 private firms in the US, or about 1/1000 of 1% of the total firms. And yet the AFL-CIO, AP and others compare the average annual wages of hundreds of millions of full-time employees working at the more than 27 million US companies to the CEO pay of executives at only several hundred companies, which is hardly a fair comparison.
Also, a screencap from the BLS:
So aside from performance-based compensation presumably not included in the averages above, the ratio is less than 4-to-1.
Also, note that the over a quarter-million CEOs, per BLS, is nearly 1,000 times larger a sample population than is thrown around by the Left–and thrown around in such a way as to leave the casual reader with the impression that they are talking about the average CEO.
If we can’t shoot down bullshit like this, we deserve to lose. Hear me? We deserve to lose if we can’t address something so damned simple.
And stop blaming the MSM for our intellectual-laziness on this topic. It’s pathetic.