Rand ‘Paul’s foreign policy views are at best foolish and naïve’

“Pentagon Official: Why Rand Paul’s Ideas Scare Me — And Why They Should Scare You,” Joseph Miller, The Daily Caller, 7/21/14:

….Paul’s narrow interpretation of a libertarian foreign policy theory cannot craft American foreign policy. The interconnectedness of the global economy, and the ability for America’s enemies to attack the country from great distances, render Paul’s policy positions little more than a philosophical fancy that may fly at college libertarian conferences, but are scary to those of us who actually do this for a living.

There is much to be said for limiting military intervention abroad, but the decision should not be determined by Paul’s dogma. The decision to undertake military action must be made after determining 1) If it’s necessary, given other potential solution; and 2) If it serves the just interests of the United States.

The problem is that Paul cannot seem to differentiate what U.S. national security interests are any more so than Obama can, though Paul does so in the name of a noninterventionist dogma, while the Obama administration simply lacks a viable and coherent foreign policy. Amid a crowded GOP field, Rand Paul stands alone in a plain of absurdity, looking over the Atlantic and Pacific oceans he somehow believes will keep our homeland safe….

The senator is best suited to argue his policy in the upper chamber, not from the Rose Garden or the Situation Room. Because given his record, if Paul does find himself calling the world shots from the executive, it will be in world unsafe to live in.

Ron Paul Is A Gibbering Loon (But You Knew That)

From Mediaite via Hot Air:

Speaking with Newsmax TV’s John Bachman earlier today, Paul said “Putin is a little bit smarter than that. I don’t think he would ever come close to participating in an act like this.”

“At the same time, there have been these new sanctions from the White House,” Bachman replied. “And there have been a lot of fingers pointed in Putin’s direction for not directly being involved but being complicit with the fact that some of these weapons — he might turn his back to it — but they’re Russian weapons.”

Paul’s response: “That may well be true, but guess what? ISIS has a lot of American weapons. We send weapons into Syria to help the rebels and if al Qaeda ends up getting it, it doesn’t mean our American government and Obama deliberately wanted ISIS to get American weapons.”

Comment is hardly necessary, is it?

More on Ron and Rand from this blog:

Rand Paul’s Antisemitic Dog Whistles

Rand Paul’s Presidential Aspirations Death Watch Update

Rand Paul Is Dangerous

Ron Paul Jumps The Beluga

Ponder This Ron Paul Quote

Ron Paul Is Not A Conservative

Your Daily Flaming Dumbass: Paulites At CPAC

Your Daily Flaming Dumbass: Ron Paul

And so on.